Defoamer Additives Cross Reference Guide for Coatings & Inks
This cross-reference guide maps INVINO defoamer additives against commonly used products from Evonik (TEGO), BYK, DOW, Elementis, and NOPCO. It covers silicone, non-silicone, and mineral oil defoamer types for waterborne and solvent-based coating systems. Because formulation responses vary by resin type, PVC, and production conditions, this list is intended as a starting reference rather than a direct 1:1 substitution guide. Lab evaluation is recommended before full-scale replacement.
Tested Against Common Systems
Products are evaluated in representative waterborne and solvent-based coating systems, covering shear stability and foam suppression performance.
Direct Manufacturer Supply
INVINO manufactures these defoamers in-house, allowing direct supply without intermediary distributors and with consistent batch quality.
Download TDS for Any INVINO Defoamer
Technical data sheets are linked directly from each product below. Lab samples can also be requested — our technical team can advise on substitution suitability for your system.
Silicone Defoamer Alternatives for Coatings & Inks
Silicone-based defoamers work by spreading rapidly across the foam surface to break air bubbles. They are generally effective at low addition levels (typically 0.05–0.3% by total formulation weight) and are suitable for both waterborne and solvent-based systems. The INVINO silicone defoamer range below is developed as functional alternatives to products from Evonik TEGO, BYK, and DOW. Actual performance in a specific coating system should be verified by side-by-side testing, as resin compatibility and shear conditions affect results.
| Category | INVINO Alternative | Reference Product |
|---|---|---|
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 463 | TEGO Foamex 3062 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO P401W | TEGO Airex 901W |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 4222 | TEGO Foamex 810 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 424 | BYK-024 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 428 | BYK-028 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 4311 | TEGO Foamex 805N / 8030 / BASF 2410 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 4343 | TEGO Foamex 822 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 435 | TEGO Foamex 825 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 437 | TEGO Foamex 1488 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO P402W | TEGO Airex 902W |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 466 | DOW DC65 |
| Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 4680 | TEGO Airex 900 |
Non-Silicone Defoamer Alternatives
Non-silicone defoamers are typically used in systems where silicone residues are a concern, such as high-build coatings with re-coating requirements or certain industrial finishes where inter-coat adhesion is critical. They generally carry a lower risk of cratering and fish-eye defects compared to silicone types, though their defoaming efficiency per unit dosage is often lower. INVINO 432 and 4920 are positioned as alternatives to TEGO Foamex 830 and TEGO Airex 920 respectively.
| Category | INVINO Alternative | Reference Product |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 432 | TEGO Foamex 830 |
| Non-Silicone Defoamer Additives | INVINO 4920 | TEGO Airex 920 |
Mineral Oil Defoamer Alternatives
Mineral oil defoamers are commonly used in industrial paints, printing inks, and adhesive systems where cost efficiency is a priority and appearance requirements are moderate. They are generally not recommended for high-gloss decorative coatings due to the risk of surface defects. INVINO 410 and 481 are developed for applications similar to Elementis DAPRO AP/DF 7015 and NOPCO NXZ.
| Category | INVINO Alternative | Reference Product |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral Oil Defoamer Additives | INVINO 410 | Elementis DAPRO AP/DF 7015 |
| Mineral Oil Defoamer Additives | INVINO 481 | NOPCO NXZ |
Technical Assistance & Laboratory Evaluation
Chemical interactions vary depending on resin matrices, pigment volume concentration (PVC), and shearing conditions during production. A cross-reference list provides a useful starting point, but an exact 1:1 match cannot be assumed without testing. Standard evaluation methods such as the stir test or foam cylinder test (ASTM D1173) are recommended before switching to full-scale production use.
Common Questions About Defoamer Substitution
Need a sample to evaluate against your current imported grade?
Request Samples & Technical Support